Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
politics [2023/09/19 23:47] – created demiurge | politics [2023/10/11 05:58] (current) – demiurge | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Lol | + | {{ : |
+ | |||
+ | ====== Politics ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Political Systems ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Illuminism | ||
+ | * Monarchism | ||
+ | * Fascism | ||
+ | * Communism | ||
+ | * Corporatocracy | ||
+ | * Rebulicanism | ||
+ | * Libertarianism | ||
+ | * Syndicalism | ||
+ | * Erisianism | ||
+ | * Gnosis | ||
+ | * Anarchism | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Introduction ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The roots of political science and history often arise during times of crisis. Many foundational philosophers addressed crises in their respective eras, laying the groundwork for modern-day political thought. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Historical Context ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | - **Hellenic Crisis:** [[: | ||
+ | - **Rome and Christianity: | ||
+ | - **Philosophy of History:** [[: | ||
+ | ==== Challenges to Traditional Political Science ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the contemporary era, there is an urgent need to evolve from past philosophies and establish a new approach to political science. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Critique of Positivism: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Philosophers like Hussero and Sasare have critiqued the positivist inclination, | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Objective Analysis: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== The Positivist Dilemma ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Positivist proclamations, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Voegelin and Symbolic Representation ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Voegelin asserted that humans derive meaning through [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Representation encompasses the entirety of society, with each symbol holding immense societal weight. | ||
+ | * Articulation is a crucial component of representation and is intrinsically tied to history, reflecting the evolution and revolutions of political societies. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Governance and Articulation ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Sir John Fortescue coined the term " | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Cosmological Empires and Truth ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Voegelin examined how early empires in Eastern civilizations viewed themselves as representatives of a transcendent cosmic order. These empires often framed rulership in terms of aligning society with a divine or cosmic harmony. Rebellions against the ruler were thus seen as rejections of truth, with historical examples like the Behestan inscription of King Darius of the Persian Empire illustrating this concept. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Clash of Truths and Societal Evolution ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Throughout history, multiple truths have often coexisted and clashed. Notable examples include the Mongol expansion threatening the Western Empire in the 13th century and the cosmological perspectives presented by [[: | ||