Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
politics [2023/09/21 00:16] – [Clash of Truths and Societal Evolution] demiurgepolitics [2023/10/11 05:58] (current) demiurge
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{  :media:real-political-spectrum.jpeg  |real-political-spectrum.jpeg}}
 +
 ====== Politics ====== ====== Politics ======
 +
 +===== Political Systems =====
 +
 +  * Illuminism
 +  * Monarchism
 +  * Fascism
 +  * Communism
 +  * Corporatocracy
 +  * Rebulicanism
 +  * Libertarianism
 +  * Syndicalism
 +  * Erisianism
 +  * Gnosis
 +  * Anarchism
  
 ==== Introduction ==== ==== Introduction ====
Line 10: Line 26:
   - **Rome and Christianity:** [[:saint-augustine|Saint Augustine]] grappled with the upheavals in [[:rome|Rome]] due to the rise of [[:christianity|Christianity]].   - **Rome and Christianity:** [[:saint-augustine|Saint Augustine]] grappled with the upheavals in [[:rome|Rome]] due to the rise of [[:christianity|Christianity]].
   - **Philosophy of History:** [[:hegel|Hegel's]] work provided a comprehensive view of the historical process.   - **Philosophy of History:** [[:hegel|Hegel's]] work provided a comprehensive view of the historical process.
- 
- 
 ==== Challenges to Traditional Political Science ==== ==== Challenges to Traditional Political Science ====
  
 In the contemporary era, there is an urgent need to evolve from past philosophies and establish a new approach to political science. In the contemporary era, there is an urgent need to evolve from past philosophies and establish a new approach to political science.
  
-**Critique of Positivism:** The positivist approach to political science, which heavily relied on a single method, has been criticized for its exclusionary nature, disregarding any knowledge that doesn't fit its stringent scientific criteria. This has been perceived as a limiting and potentially misleading method.+**Critique of Positivism:**  The positivist approach to political science, which heavily relied on a single method, has been criticized for its exclusionary nature, disregarding any knowledge that doesn't fit its stringent scientific criteria. This has been perceived as a limiting and potentially misleading method.
  
-   * Philosophers like Hussero and Sasare have critiqued the positivist inclination, providing alternate perspectives on political theory.+  * Philosophers like Hussero and Sasare have critiqued the positivist inclination, providing alternate perspectives on political theory.
  
 **Objective Analysis:**  As emphasized by Pierre Bourdieu, a truly objective study of political science should encompass all value judgments and viewpoints, recognizing all forms of cultural capital and preventing biases. **Objective Analysis:**  As emphasized by Pierre Bourdieu, a truly objective study of political science should encompass all value judgments and viewpoints, recognizing all forms of cultural capital and preventing biases.
- 
  
 ==== The Positivist Dilemma ==== ==== The Positivist Dilemma ====
Line 33: Line 46:
   * Representation encompasses the entirety of society, with each symbol holding immense societal weight.   * Representation encompasses the entirety of society, with each symbol holding immense societal weight.
   * Articulation is a crucial component of representation and is intrinsically tied to history, reflecting the evolution and revolutions of political societies.   * Articulation is a crucial component of representation and is intrinsically tied to history, reflecting the evolution and revolutions of political societies.
- 
  
 ==== Governance and Articulation ==== ==== Governance and Articulation ====
Line 45: Line 57:
 ==== Clash of Truths and Societal Evolution ==== ==== Clash of Truths and Societal Evolution ====
  
-Throughout history, multiple truths have often coexisted and clashed. Notable examples include the Mongol expansion threatening the Western Empire in the 13th century and the cosmological perspectives presented by [[:laotzu|Lao Tzu]], [[:confucius|Confucius]], the Upanishads, and Zoroastrianism. This period, around 500 BC, with contemporaries like Heraclitus, [[:Buddha|]], and Confucius, is termed as the "axis time" by Carl Jaspers.+Throughout history, multiple truths have often coexisted and clashed. Notable examples include the Mongol expansion threatening the Western Empire in the 13th century and the cosmological perspectives presented by [[:laotzu|Lao Tzu]], [[:confucius|Confucius]], the Upanishads, and Zoroastrianism. This period, around 500 BC, with contemporaries like Heraclitus, [[:buddha|Buddha]], and Confucius, is termed as the "axis time" by Carl Jaspers.