Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
techne [2025/09/23 17:29] – demiurge | techne [2025/09/23 17:30] (current) – demiurge | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In classical [[: | In classical [[: | ||
- | This ancient notion resonates strongly with our contemporary idea of **[[:t|technology]]** , a word whose very root (//techne// + //logos//) literally means “discourse on craft.” Technology is more than just tools; it embodies accumulated methods of knowing how to do things whether programming a computer, designing an algorithm, or engineering a machine. When we describe technology as applied science, we often overlook that it also inherits from //technē// an aesthetic and ethical dimension: it is about creating forms in the world, not just solving problems. | + | This ancient notion resonates strongly with our contemporary idea of **[[:cs|technology]]** , a word whose very root (//techne// + //logos//) literally means “discourse on craft.” Technology is more than just tools; it embodies accumulated methods of knowing how to do things whether programming a computer, designing an algorithm, or engineering a machine. When we describe technology as applied science, we often overlook that it also inherits from //technē// an aesthetic and ethical dimension: it is about creating forms in the world, not just solving problems. |
Seen through this lens, technology today can be understood not only as material devices but as an extension of //technē// the human capacity to shape reality through knowledge and skill. This framing highlights both its promise and its danger: the same practical mastery that can produce medicine and art can also yield systems of control or destruction. To recover the full meaning of //technē// is to remember that technology is always entwined with values, creativity, and the ways we imagine what it means to live well. | Seen through this lens, technology today can be understood not only as material devices but as an extension of //technē// the human capacity to shape reality through knowledge and skill. This framing highlights both its promise and its danger: the same practical mastery that can produce medicine and art can also yield systems of control or destruction. To recover the full meaning of //technē// is to remember that technology is always entwined with values, creativity, and the ways we imagine what it means to live well. | ||